John Ashbery- Just when I thought there wasn't room enough for another thought in my head, I had this great idea— call it a philosophy of life, if you will. Briefly, it involved living the way philosophers live, according to a set of principles. OK, but which ones?
Existence precedes essence Sartre claimed that a central proposition of Existentialism is that existence precedes essencewhich means that the most important consideration for individuals is that they are individuals—independently acting and responsible, conscious beings "existence" —rather than what labels, roles, stereotypes, definitions, or other preconceived categories the individuals fit "essence".
The actual life of the individuals is what constitutes what could be called their "true essence" instead of there being an arbitrarily attributed essence others use to define them. Thus, human beings, through their own consciousnesscreate their own values and determine a meaning to their life.
His form must be just as manifold as are the opposites that he holds together.
The systematic eins, zwei, drei is an abstract form that also must inevitably run into trouble whenever it is to be applied to the concrete. To the same degree as the subjective thinker is concrete, to the same degree his form must also be concretely dialectical.
But just as he himself is not a poet, not an ethicist, not a dialectician, so also his form is none of these directly. His form must first and last be related to existence, and in this regard he must have at his disposal the poetic, the ethical, the dialectical, the religious. Subordinate character, setting, etc.
The setting is not the fairyland of the imagination, where poetry produces consummation, nor is the setting laid in England, and historical accuracy is not a concern. The setting is inwardness in existing as a human being; the concretion is the relation of the existence-categories to one another.
Historical accuracy and historical actuality are breadth. However, an existentialist philosopher would say such a wish constitutes an inauthentic existence - what Sartre would call ' bad faith '.
Instead, the phrase should be taken to say that people are 1 defined only insofar as they act and 2 that they are responsible for their actions.
For example, someone who acts cruelly towards other people is, by that act, defined as a cruel person. Furthermore, by this action of cruelty, such persons are themselves responsible for their new identity cruel persons. This is as opposed to their genes, or human nature, bearing the blame.
As Sartre says in his lecture Existentialism is a Humanism: The more positive, therapeutic aspect of this is also implied: A person can choose to act in a different way, and to be a good person instead of a cruel person. In the correspondence with Jean Beaufret later published as the Letter on HumanismHeidegger implies that Sartre misunderstood him for his own purposes of subjectivism, and that he did not mean that actions take precedence over being so long as those actions were not reflected upon.
Absurdism The notion of the Absurd contains the idea that there is no meaning in the world beyond what meaning we give it. This meaninglessness also encompasses the amorality or "unfairness" of the world.
This conceptualization can be highlighted in the way it opposes the traditional Judeo-Christian-Islamic perspective, which establishes that life's purpose is about the fulfillment of God's commandments.
To live the life of the absurd means rejecting a life that finds or pursues specific meaning for man's existence since there is nothing to be discovered. According to Albert Camus, the world or the human being is not in itself absurd.
The concept only emerges through the juxtaposition of the two, where life becomes absurd due to the incompatibility between human beings and the world they inhabit.
These are considered absurd since they issue from human freedom, undermining their foundation outside of themselves. The notion of the Absurd has been prominent in literature throughout history. It is in relation to the concept of the devastating awareness of meaninglessness that Albert Camus claimed that "there is only one truly serious philosophical problem, and that is suicide" in his The Myth of Sisyphus.
Although "prescriptions" against the possibly deleterious consequences of these kinds of encounters vary, from Kierkegaard's religious "stage" to Camus' insistence on persevering in spite of absurdity, the concern with helping people avoid living their lives in ways that put them in the perpetual danger of having everything meaningful break down is common to most existentialist philosophers.
The possibility of having everything meaningful break down poses a threat of quietismwhich is inherently against the existentialist philosophy.I don’t know if I really lived the earlier part of my life with a personal plombier-nemours.com of it may have been naturally instinctive, and some of it may have been just a part of my upbringing and guidance from my parents..
In thinking about it, a certain portion of my life just felt like being in a vehicle coasting down a hill without it being in gear. My Own Philosophy of Life.
Rudolf Bless 1 If you stand on your head for long enough, you may come to believe that the world as you see it is normal. Philosophy of life will be different between each person. A persons philosophy will vary depending on ones life experience. I believe that no two people will have seen life in the same way.
There would be many people that have similar philosophy on life but none of them would be exactly the same. I. May 17, · How to Form a Philosophy.
Developing a personal philosophy can be a deeply rewarding life experience. A personal philosophy is a framework that helps you understand who you are and make sense of your life. Forming your own philosophy is 92%(). My Philosophy of Life John Ashbery, - Just when I thought there wasn't room enough for another thought in my head, I had this great idea— call it a philosophy of life, if you will.
My focus is on personal philosophy, and the essential philosophical elements are centered on beliefs, concepts or ideas, and attitudes.
Simply asked, what is your approach to living your life? Putting your approach into philosophical terms may seem unnecessary, too elementary or just an academic exercise.